<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Stick: Debunked!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macsoda.com/2008/11/17/ipod-stick-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macsoda.com/2008/11/17/ipod-stick-debunked/</link>
	<description>Quenching Your Thirst For Everything Apple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena</title>
		<link>http://macsoda.com/2008/11/17/ipod-stick-debunked/#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macsoda.wordpress.com/?p=849#comment-5205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m impressed! You&#039;ve managed the almost imsposblie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed! You&#8217;ve managed the almost imsposblie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorgen</title>
		<link>http://macsoda.com/2008/11/17/ipod-stick-debunked/#comment-3301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorgen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macsoda.wordpress.com/?p=849#comment-3301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymity in this case means they don&#039;t reveal his identity.  Just like anonymous tips to crimewatchers, they can take your information so they can give you a reward if your tip leads to the arrest, but you are &quot;anonymous&quot; and not required to testify.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymity in this case means they don&#8217;t reveal his identity.  Just like anonymous tips to crimewatchers, they can take your information so they can give you a reward if your tip leads to the arrest, but you are &#8220;anonymous&#8221; and not required to testify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaze</title>
		<link>http://macsoda.com/2008/11/17/ipod-stick-debunked/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macsoda.wordpress.com/?p=849#comment-1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JuKrsznHOB2BR]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JuKrsznHOB2BR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://macsoda.com/2008/11/17/ipod-stick-debunked/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[william]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macsoda.wordpress.com/?p=849#comment-990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that they claim it&#039;s the same source doesn&#039;t at all mean that it isn&#039;t anonymous.  If the source references some information that only the person who submitted the original tip would know, it wouldn&#039;t be so hard to know that it is probably the same person.  

That said, it looks and sounds fake to me.  I don&#039;t see what niche that thing would fill, what capabilities it would have to set it apart, other than being much bigger than a shuffle and having a screen.  In other words, much like every other low-end mp3 player. I think Apple would really prefer to up-sell to the Nano than come up with a better low end.  Who knows?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that they claim it&#8217;s the same source doesn&#8217;t at all mean that it isn&#8217;t anonymous.  If the source references some information that only the person who submitted the original tip would know, it wouldn&#8217;t be so hard to know that it is probably the same person.  </p>
<p>That said, it looks and sounds fake to me.  I don&#8217;t see what niche that thing would fill, what capabilities it would have to set it apart, other than being much bigger than a shuffle and having a screen.  In other words, much like every other low-end mp3 player. I think Apple would really prefer to up-sell to the Nano than come up with a better low end.  Who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

